Clean label cull: French supermarket cuts 90 'controversial' substances from private label products

© iStock

French supermarket Super U has pledged to remove or reduce 90 “controversial” substances from its private label range, including palm oil, aspartame, monosodium glutamate, bisphenol A and fructose-glucose syrup, citing consumer fears and the cocktail effect. But is there any scientific basis behind its decision?

The list includes 26 pesticides, the 'Southampton Six' food colours - which many European food manufacturers have also voluntarily phased out - and titanium dioxide.

Super U said its decision was triggered by consumer fears. "These concerns [over chemicals] are amplified by television, print media and some scientific discussions but also by a lack of information. Consumers, rightly or wrongly, come to conclusions on the toxicity of these substances. These concerns are directly relayed back to us in our stores and through inquiries about our products.

"Aware of these fears and of consumer expectations for more simplified products, we have decided not to take refuge behind the regulations. We considered that going beyond this by eliminating these controversial substances, was part of our mission towards our customers.”

To see the full list of substances, click here.

The retailer said it chose the substances according to several factors, including the fact that threshold levels cannot be considered as “an absolute rule” or the cocktail effect - the cumulative effect of many chemicals in the body even though individually they may be safe.

The chemical cocktail effect

Professor of molecular toxicology at the Technical University of Denmark's National Food Institute Anne Marie Vinggaard told FoodNavigator she could not perform an in-depth analysis of all 90 substances, but noted that the list contained many pesticides, phthalates, bisphenols and parabens, among others. "These belong to the substances that are of concern as many of them are known to induce cocktail effects.”

“We are concerned that humans are not adequately protected from the combined exposure to many chemicals that arises from many different sources such as foods,

consumer products, dust and food packaging. Especially exposure of the unborn foetus is of concern.  

“It is generally not food additives that are of highest concern as these substances generally have been thoroughly tested. Rather it is contaminants (non-intentionally added chemicals) in our foods and chemicals from the other mentioned sources that are of highest concern.”

In general risk assessments performed by agencies such as EFSA are for individual substances one by on. "Only in a few cases [are] cocktail effects taken into account. This needs to be changed in the future."

Vannegaard also questioned Super U’s depiction of the 90 substances as scary cartoon characters for its campaign, saying they look scary. "I would prefer a more sober campaign," she said, adding: “I would give the supermarket the advice to team up with experts and get their input for their campaign.” 


Food industry watchdog and consumer interest group, Foodwatch, gave measured praise for Super U's initiative. “It is clear that there is still a lot to be done and not all the measures already many proposals. But the signal Super U statutory takes measures for the health of its customers and the environment is encouraging.”

But Foodwatch questioned the retailer's action in some cases, for instance, by replacing isoglucose (also known as high fructose corn syrup or fructose-glucose syrup) with sugar rather than aiming to reduce sugar content.

Meanwhile it added that the presence of glyphosate on Super U's list referred to the fact that the consumer-facing weedkiller Roundup would no longer be sold in its stores, rather than traces of the agricultural herbicide in food.

Related News

© iStock/PRImageFactory

Novozymes gets EFSA green light for two glucose syrup enzymes

Low levels of chemicals in food may be harmless in isolation - but researchers suggest they could have an additive effect

Food chemicals may have harmful ‘cocktail’ effect

FSA calls for health report on the 'cocktail' effect of contaminants in food products

© iStock

Almost one fifth of children are over tolerable levels for potential carcinogen 3-MCPD

Italian consumer watchdog is warning parents not to give children products that contain palm oil due to carcinogenic contaminants. ©

Don't give children palm oil, says Italian consumer group

EFSA calls for Southampton colours food safety review

EFSA calls for safety tests for six food dyes – including five Southampton colours

EFSA lowers ADI for three Southampton colours

None of the exposure estimates exceeded the ADI in any population, according to EFSA's assessment of the latest data

‘Southampton’ colour Allura Red safe at current levels, EFSA finds

Renewed calls for European ban on Southampton additives

Allergic reactions to azo dyes in foods unlikely, EFSA

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

Hugo Cabret - 10 Feb 2017 | 05:07

Phony Controversy Over Food Ingredients

Where does this end? The pursuit of the impossible labor of making food supplies "safe for everyone all the time" is fruitless and costly. Small numbers of misinformed consumers support non-governmental organizations (NGO's) with alterior motives (almost always monetary ones) who pressure manufacturers and retailers who push the panic button to "ban and remove all the bad stuff". NO SCIENCE, NO LOGIC, AND NO CREDIBILITY BEHIND THE DECISION MAKING LEAD TO LOWER AVAILABILITY, HIGH COSTS PASSED TO THE CONSUMER, AND DIMINISHED FOOD SAFETY. Science, especially the chemistry of food, is fun and exciting. Let us stop the insanity ginned up by those who are ignorant of the facts and refuse to learn the truth.

10-Feb-2017 at 17:07 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.