Should companies use social media to deal with a food scandal?

Should companies use social media to deal with a food scandal?

Social media can be a company’s best friend for communicating to consumers - but the tables can quickly turn when consumers talk back. So should food companies get hashtag-happy when dealing with sensitive issues such as food scandals?

Food companies and consumers have never been so well connected, with social media providing a platform for simple and direct communication as never before.

And while this can work in a company’s favour while the going is good, social media can quickly backfire and spin out of a company's control  – as Coca-Cola found out when it was tricked into tweeting snippets of Hitler’s Mein Kampf, to give an example of just one company's online blunder.

So should social media be embraced or avoided if a company finds itself embroiled in a serious food scandal?

For Alice Cadman, director of business development and marketing at Leatherhead, marketing teams in food businesses are fully aware of the stakes at play.

“If consumers start to question the authenticity or origin of the ingredients, years of marketing investment can be undermined in a matter of hours,” she told FoodNavigator.

If you decide to use social media to weather a food scandal storm, consider taking Steve Osborn's advice on board:

  • Make social media management an integral part of crisis management – with documented procedures
  • Acknowledge all complaints on the social media platform
  • Don’t deny any involvement or responsibility 
  • Apologise for the dissatisfaction, and take the discussion offline
  • Announce the ‘close out’ on the same social media platform it was announced
  • Provide regular reassurance for ongoing issues
  • Consider the tone of the social media platform – avoid being flippant
  • Remember a well-managed response can even enhance a company’s reputation.

Food and beverage consultant at Aurora Ceres Steve Osborn said that it was the quick-fire nature of social media that was intimidating – but that food companies could protect themselves by having a Twitter/Facebook/Reddit crisis management strategy in place.

“The instant nature of social media is a significant concern to brands and retailers alike, as the potential for immediate exposure by an angry customer [can] reach a wide audience quickly.

Osborn said that social media were crucial in restoring consumer confidence after a shock.

“Companies can recover from food safety crises – if they are responsive. If they fail to acknowledge an issue has been raised, fail to investigate and fail to implement corrective action then the implications can be catastrophic. 

This had always been the case, he said, but was much more important in today’s era of instant 24 hour communication.

But not everyone is convinced that a well-managed social media response is important in restoring consumer confidence.

Euromonitor analyst Jack Skelly said food scandals damaged sales for a brief period of time only. After a few months the controversy had either been forgotten or replaced by another and sales returned to normal – and it was difficult to say with certainty whether this had anything to do with a company’s heartfelt Twitter apology.

Skelly pointed to sales of meat in Western Europe, which have recovered to their pre-horsemeat level following a 6% increase in 2014.

“Everyone has cognitive dissonance about these issues – we tend to say one thing and ignore evidence that suggests we are contradicting this. This applies to purchasing habits in shops as much as anything else – many people probably stated that they would never buy non-responsibly sourced meat again, but no doubt went back to their typical ways of shopping after a few months.”

Leatherhead food scentist Monee Shamsher offered a middle road, saying that food crises needed to be prevented by practical measures with concrete results, such as tighter supply chains and DNA testing - and social media were not an end in themselves, but did play an essential role in communicating these efforts to consumers and restoring confidence.

We can be certain that there will be another case of food fraud on the scale of horsegate somewhere down the lineFuture fraud will be very widely reported in conventional and social media, it will quickly escalate to become a ‘vote catcher’ with the associated bad brand publicity and consumer rejection,” she wrote in a Leatherhead white paper.

“By embracing new analytical methods for fraud detection and conveying their use to external audiences, brands can reassure consumers.”

 

Related News

Social media warning: Engaging with customers leads to more complaints

Social media warning: Engaging with customers leads to more complaints

Being passive is so passé: “No one is waiting to be wooed by elaborate campaigns," says SDL. "These days, marketing success depends on customers seeing, engaging with – and sharing – your content within their trusted social networks.”

How good are food companies at social listening?

"Brands tend to treat Facebook fans as a happy but lobotomised mass," says Yeomans.

Big food firms are climate smart but social media stupid

Following the discovery of equine DNA in burgers in the UK and Ireland in early 2013, investigations by the NVWA resulted in the recall of around 50,000 tonnes (t) of beef from across Europe. (image: iStock.com)

Dutch authorities name 1800 firms that bought from horsemeat trader

The most effective way of connecting emotionally to consumers is through storytelling, said Karen Fewell at this year's Food Vision. "There is no 'buy' button in the brain, but there is a 'story' button." © iStock

What is emotional marketing and how can social media help you get it right?

Photo: iStock

A history of food, art, Instagram - and unintended consequences

Brands are now looking past print and television advertising to social media platforms like Twitter and Instagram. ©iStock

Social media could get Brits to eat their fruit and veg – Euromonitor

© iStock/Seewhatmitchsee

Advertising regulator rules against Alpro over paid-for tweets

Which emoji best represents the way you felt after watching Pizza Hut's video? © iStock/microvone

Can ‘happy’ pizza make sad days go away?

More than a third of food businesses still have no social media policy, according to Roythornes' survey

Food firms warned not to ignore social media

Are food companies getting social media right? In a word, 'no'

Are food companies getting social media right? In a word, 'no'

Social media: dream or nightmare? What can be learned from Coca-Cola’s Hitler retweets?

Social media: dream or nightmare? What can be learned from Coca-Cola’s Hitler retweets?

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.