Can organic feed the world?

Organic farming tends to have lower crop yields than conventional farming - but it is also less reliant on non-renewable inputs

Organic crops generally have lower yields than conventional crops – but that’s not the only way to measure their potential to feed the world.

Proponents of organic agriculture say it leads to better soil management, uses fewer pesticides and fertilisers, and is a better protector of biodiversity. However, when it comes to increasing food production for a growing global population, others argue that organic’s lower average yields would mean clearing more land for agriculture.

According to a 2012 meta-analysis, organic crop yields average about 80% of those of conventional crops – but there is huge variation depending on the region and crop variety. The researchers found that while organic fruit trees, beans and alfalfa delivered just 5% lower yields, major cereal crops and vegetables yielded about 25% less than their conventionally grown counterparts.

Pest control

They suggested that when conventional crops were near their maximum potential yields, pests and diseases in organic crops would have to be extremely well controlled to match up – factors that tend to be a greater challenge in organic agriculture.

A more recent meta-analysis published in January this year found a similar gap in the productivity of organic agriculture – an average of 19.2% – and suggested that the gap could be narrowed to 8 or 9% with different crop management techniques.

Reducing non-renewable inputs

But while much of the debate has focused on whether organic can match the yields of conventional agriculture, advocates suggest organic foods offer more long-term viability even if yields are lower.

US economist and social theorist Jeremy Rifkin, for example, suggests that global agriculture must shift toward organic in order to reduce dependence on petrochemical-based fertilisers and pesticides, which are likely to see prices skyrocket in the mid- to long-term.

However, even though organic farming avoids non-renewable inputs, the land use dilemma remains. NGO Forest Trends claims that more than 70% of tropical deforestation since 2000 was for agricultural conversion, and more than 6m hectares of tropical rainforest are lost each year.

Any move toward more organic systems therefore would need to reduce land use, rather than increase it – a big challenge when the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) estimates that food production will need to double by 2050.

Waste reduction

Food waste may be a significant part of the equation. One in three forkfuls of food is wasted or lost before it reaches the consumer, according to the FAO, so waste reduction could be a way to increase the amount of food on the average plate without having to cut down forest. But without waste reduction, ways to increase crop yields seem vital to our future ability to feed the planet.

Finally, the argument over whether the planet has enough land to sustain more cropland also assumes that dietary patterns will remain constant over the coming decades, but Western diets, at least, increasingly are moving away from meat consumption, which uses more grain than plant-based diets. With 40% of the world’s grain already being used for feed – estimated to increase to 60% by 2050, according to the FAO – a shift away from animal products could make organic agriculture a more viable mainstream option.

A third way?

While debate over organic’s role in future food production tends to pit organic against conventional farming, conservation farming may provide a compromise. It doesn’t explicitly prohibit any farming practices, but encourages soil and water conservation and the use of mulch to minimise runoff and erosion.

The FAO has called it “a concept for resource-saving agricultural crop production that strives to achieve acceptable profits together with high and sustained production levels while concurrently conserving the environment”.

Even UK-based organic advocacy organisation, The Soil Association, has argued that sustainable agriculture does not necessarily begin with organic production. Its chief executive, Helen Browning, said at a conference in 2013 that good food was about how it is produced – but said The Soil Association had sometimes become too associated with campaigns against genetic modification or pesticides.

“Unless we deliver positive real world solutions, policies that are genuinely likely to stand up, we will have failed,” she said. “I want us much more to be known for what we are for, rather than what we are against.”

According to Eurostat, only about 4% of agricultural land in Europe is organically managed, despite consumers’ willingness to pay a premium for organic foods in many markets. The European organic market has increased fourfold over the past decade according to EU figures, but organic agricultural land has only doubled over the same period.

Related News

Organic breaks social class barriers

Organic breaks social class barriers

Six in 10 non-organic shoppers see organic as overpriced, says Mintel

Investment to tackle organic ‘price barrier’

One of the biggest challenges was farmer resistance to the new system, Mondelez said

Egypt wheat farming scheme boosts harvests 10%

Germany aims to boost land switch for organic farming

Germany aims to boost land switch for organic farming

Organic food production ‘needs direction’ to be sustainable, warns US study

Organic food production ‘needs direction’ to be sustainable, warns US study

Organic packaged food is synonymous with both quality and convenience for Italian and French consumers.

Italy and France show promise for organic packaged food

“Organic farming should receive more attention in the public debate as it provides investment in public health,” said Bulgarian MEP Momchil Nekov,

Incredible organic? More studies needed to substantiate health effects

'The organic sector finally seems to have twigged that it needs to explain in simple terms why organic is worth paying more for,' says Mintel analyst, Alex Beckett.

Is the ethical shopper's purse big enough for organic AND fairtrade?

Current thinking suggests organic food is more nutritionally dense and less exposed to pesticides when compared to foods produced by conventional farming methods. (©

Why do people buy organic? Separating myth from motivation

'Adopting truly sustainable farming systems on a wide scale is our best opportunity for meeting this grand challenge and ensuring future food and ecosystem security,' write the authors. © iStock

Organic growth set to double – but it won’t feed the planet alone: Study

'As shoppers continue to move away from the ‘big shop’ towards the high street, signs look positive for future organic retail sales,' said Soil Association chief executive, Helen Browning. © iStock

Innovation and changing shopping habits fuel UK organic sales

According to trade association Organic Denmark, 90% of consumers who recognise the state-controlled Ø-mark  say it is a ‘highly trusted’ logo. © iStock

Awareness of state organic logo is 100%, says Danish government

More than nine out of 10 (91%) consumers think food should remain affordable, but only around half (54%) think that farmers should be able to use pesticides to keep prices down. © iStock

Cheap food or no pesticides: Consumers can’t have it both ways, says ECPA

Research has suggested that the amount of processing of organic foods seems to be negatively associated with sales, suggesting that the nutritional benefits of consuming organic ingredients are somehow lost in processing. ©iStock/leventalbas

Lost in processing? Organic’s ‘halo effect’ blunted in processed food

© iStock/demaerre

What's the future of farming? It can only be agroecology, says Farms of the Future

Information about the food's ethicality often bears little or no implications for its nutritional and gustatory quality but [the ethical label] may positively influence taste, say the researchers.

Ethical foods make consumers feel morally superior - and food taste better

The heat is on: Growing grain to produce meat is contributing to 'real-time climate change', says Rifkin

Jeremy Rifkin: Meat is ‘the most inefficient way of feeding the human race’

Can organic foods and GM-like technologies ever go hand in hand?

Can organic foods and GM-like technologies ever go hand in hand?

Eco-labels are often a way for food companies to demonstrate that they are fulfilling their promises, Sahota said

Sustainability standards in the spotlight: ‘Still taking baby steps’

Harnessing big data will help companies, governments and individuals to identify and eliminate inefficiencies in their value chain, says Rifkin

Organic, renewable…and disruptive: Welcome to the third industrial revolution

Comments (7)

Hugo Cabret - 01 May 2015 | 05:48

Say Anything

It is such a crime that crap science is the fodder of so many. The Primitives will continue to spew the unfounded virtues and superiority of organic agriculture with little, often no, real science to back it up. Simply saying that organic agricultural products are "better" for children, the soil, the planet, blah, blah, blah, does not make it factual. Unfortunately, too many folks want to have something to hate and believe the baseless propaganda of the "greatness" of organic perpetrated by the self-crowned Masterminds and Primitives. WHO IS JOHN GALT!

01-May-2015 at 17:48 GMT

Mischa Popoff - 29 Apr 2015 | 06:26

Herd immunity

The 2012 meta-analysis you reference was deeply flawed because it failed to take into account how organic farms benefit from the pest control being carried out by neighboring conventional farmers. It's the same with people who don't vaccinate their kids. They point out that their kids are healthy, but fail to see that diseases are prevented from even reaching their kids due to the high rate of vaccination in the population at large. This is called herd immunity. Without pest control by neighboring conventional farmers, organic farmers would suffer unimaginable losses, right up-to-and-including total crop failure.

29-Apr-2015 at 18:26 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.