Being anti-GMO may have ‘intuitive appeal’

Many representations of GMOs, like this one, tap into intuitive ideas of unnaturalness - even though this is far from the reality of GM technology

Rejection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) may be intuitive for many people, claims a paper published in the journal Trends in Plant Science.

A team of Belgian philosophers and plant scientists looked to cognitive science for reasons why anti-GMO sentiment remains strong, despite a growing body of evidence that GM crops do not pose specific health or environmental risks, and may benefit local farmers.

“The discrepancy between public opinion and the scientific evidence requires an explanation,” they wrote. “We argue that intuitive expectations about the world render the human mind vulnerable to particular misrepresentations of GMOs.”

Legitimate concerns…on a case-by-case basis

The paper’s authors acknowledge that there are some legitimate concerns about particular GM crops and their uses, but they underline that these tend to be unrelated to the technology itself and need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

“For instance, herbicide resistance in weeds has indeed become a problem in areas such as the USA and Argentina where farmers have over-relied on a single herbicide-resistant crop that was tolerant to glyphosate. However, these concerns are typically unrelated to the technology of genetic modification, and instead result from unsound agricultural practices and policy that also can cause problems in the case of ‘conventional’ crops,” they wrote.

Disgust, unnaturalness, essentialism

They argue that the intuitive mind is not well-equipped to deal with questions like ‘how does it work’ or ‘is it dangerous’ – and most people are not predisposed to spending significant time in understanding complex technologies, so their intuitions win out. These are based on several assumptions and superstitions, including the idea that natural organisms have an immutable core or essence that should not be tampered with, or the idea that scientists should not ‘play God’.

"This reasoning of course conflicts with evolutionary theory – the idea that in evolution one species can change into another,” said lead author Stefaan Blancke, a philosopher at Ghent University.

Other anti-GMO intuitions are based on moral objections and emotions, triggered by stories of multinationals chaining small producers to using their seeds, for example. The paper’s authors added that while such claims were important to investigate, immoral business practices were not confined to a specific technology.

"The popularity and typical features of the opposition to GMOs can be explained in terms of underlying cognitive processes. Anti-GMO messages strongly appeal to particular intuitions and emotions,” said Blancke.

“Negative representations of GMOs – for instance, like claims that GMOs cause diseases and contaminate the environment – tap into our feelings of disgust and this sticks to the mind. These emotions are very difficult to counter, in particular because the science of GMOs is complex to communicate."

However

 

 

Source: Trends in Plant Science

doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011

“Fatal attraction: the intuitive appeal of GMO opposition”

Authors: Stefaan Blancke, Frank Van Breusegem, Geert De Jaeger, Johan Braeckman, Marc Van Montagu

Related News

Greece and Latvia opt out of Monsanto MON810 re-authorisation application

Greece and Latvia opt out of Monsanto MON810 re-authorisation application

Parliament failed to reach the required majority, leaving the decision in the hands of the commission  ©iStock

MEPs oppose GM approvals but Commission will have the final say

Can organic foods and GM-like technologies ever go hand in hand?

Can organic foods and GM-like technologies ever go hand in hand?

Once adopted, today's proposal will grant Member States a greater say over the use of EU- authorised GMOs in food and feed, says EU Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis.

New GM package could pave way national ban on GM foods and imports – but not everybody is happy

The previous status quo allowed crops to be grown anywhere in Europe following EU approval, although only one GM crop, Monsanto maize variety MON810, is grown commercially in the EU.

Member states back national bans for GM crops

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (5)

fennel - 12 May 2015 | 11:32

I like to know what I am feeding my family

genetically modified products are mixed with unlikely genes from unrelated items, for instance if you eat a tomato you would expect it to be a tomato, not a tomato and seafood mix. The Portuguese tomato that is fishy can and has killed a man who was allergic to seafood. Perhaps it should be labelled as a tomato-fish and then we know what we are buying.

12-May-2015 at 23:32 GMT

Lorraine - 13 May 2015 | 11:55

Science to back up claims

To "growing body of evidence of dangers of GMO" and "Unlawful" I am very much interested in reading the scientific research that supports your comments. Could you please post a link or provide the references?

13-May-2015 at 23:55 GMT
MORE COMMENTS

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.