Brexit Briefings: Interview

What are Britain's post-Brexit options and how will it impact industry?

'People will pay more for food. The British people have voted to raise the food prices,' says professor Tim Lang. Photo: iStock

Rising food prices, watered-down safety standards, food law dictated by big businesses and a disastrous impact on public health. Professor in food policy Tim Lang looks at the options of a post-Brexit UK but sees little light at the end of the channel tunnel. 

Until negotiations have been completed, European Union law remains in force in the UK. The immediate impact of the decision to quit the 28-member state bloc looks like rising food prices in a country that produces and grows less than 60% of the food it eats and is particularly reliant on imports from the EU for fruit and vegetables.

Speaking to FoodNavigator yesterday, Tim Lang predicted it could take five to 10 years for the UK to become food self-sufficient in food products, if that extreme scenario ever arose. And in the meantime? “People will pay more for food. The British people have voted to raise the food prices," he said simply. 

"Where do they think their food comes from? Planet Zog?"

The consequences of rising prices could be disastrous for public health as a large proportion of the UK’s EU imports are fruit and vegetables.  “Around 40% of horticultural products are imported from the EU – 40% of all the things that are good for health."

But none of this is news. Tim Lang and his colleague Victoria Schoen of the Food Research Collaboration published a report earlier this year warning of the consequences of a Brexit vote.

"We prophesised it, we knew it."

The options: EU law, 'Groundhog day' or 'slash and burn' 

So what are the UK's options and what will the impact on the food industry be?

According to professor Lang there are three "very simple" options that could be pursued following the activation of Article 50 which permits an EU member state to leave the union.  

The first is that the UK could choose to take on all of the EU’s acquis communautaire – the compilation or accumulation over time of legislation and court decisions which make up the body of European Union law. “But in this case most people who voted to leave would be unhappy.”

The second option would be to retain the acquis communautaire but weave out undesired EU law and cherry-picking which articles should be kept. This could take up to ten years requiring huge amounts of time, energy and resources.

“This anticipates a huge amount of time and energy given to such discussions. It means revisiting 43 years of what has already been decided in a kind of food policy groundhog day. This negotiation and sifting would have to reshape or reaffirm the legal basis of internal, trade and external frameworks,” writes professor Lang in the Brexit or Bremain report.

The third option is the one that would have the biggest consequences for food safety and standards. Professor Lang calls this the ‘slash and burn’ option whereby UK policymakers simply adopt World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules and the World Health Organisation (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) Codex Alimentarius for food standards and safety.

But given that the WTO rules are “the lowest common denominator” and the Codex Alimentarius is determined in meetings that are “dominated by big business and lobbies [making] the EU look like the most democratic organisation in the world”, this is far from ideal. The result would be food riots, says professor Lang.

'It would be a farce if it wasn’t such a tragedy'

Nor will unravelling 43 years of co-negotiated food legislation – part of some 12,295 EU regulations – happen in two years.

According to some estimates 98% of UK food law is based on EU law and according to professor Lang, the enormity of renegotiating labelling requirements, trade agreements, safety regulations and labour rights – to name but a few – will be magnified because the UK currently does not have enough people to do so.

“The British government has spent all its time cutting the number of civil servants. Six years ago the Food Standards Agency (FSA) had five floors – now they have two. There’s no one there to do this.

“And Britain has almost no experience in world trade negotiations because we’ve done them through the EU. It would be a farce if it wasn’t such a tragedy.”

The EU is unlikely to grant the UK the same trade benefits it enjoyed pre-Brexit. German chancellor Angela Merkel has said it cannot expect to keep the privileges of EU ties without any of the obligations.

Meanwhile UK Indepedence Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage was laughed at and booed by MEPs at an extraordinary plenary session in Brussels earlier today as he told the EU to "grow up" and grant the UK tariff-free trade with the single market so that Britain could “fulfil [its] global ambitions”.

Will negotiations be independently monitored?

So which of the three options would professor Lang go for? He is loath to make a choice – “they are all crazy” - but given that this situation is now a reality, he says the most important is to ensure there is a massive intake of civil servants to run and oversee the negotiations.

Parallel to this, and more importantly, he says there must be independent academics and scientists who come together to establish a monitoring system “to make damn sure big food business and other nasty elements don’t have a lovely time speculating with our food.”

It is imperative this monitoring system is independent, audited and held to public account, and professor Lang is in the process of calling together interested parties to participate. While he could not say who he had contacted, he confirmed he has had a lot of interest from academics in all sectors: “In all sectors, there is outrage.” 

'a period of complete chaos'

Professor Lang’s feelings of incredulity and anger have been echoed by others in the food sector, an industry not normally given to using dramatic words lightly.

Yesterday, director general of the UK’s food trade group Food and Drink Federation (FDF) Ian Wright told attendees at a conference held by the Grocery Code Adjudicator the country is now facing “a period of complete chaos”.

“The country is leaderless on both sides. The remain camp has no plan B and those who voted leave have no plan at all. We face months of profound uncertainty.”

Meanwhile on Monday the head of the National Farmers Union (NFU), which opposed Brexit but chose not to campaign against it or advise members how to vote, called the referendum result “a political car crash”. Meurig Raymond told The Guardian the country should brace itself for higher food prices given its reliance on food imports from the EU combined with the pound falling to a 31-year low against the dollar yesterday.


Although Bank of England director Mark Carey has sought to reassure business, saying banks’ finances are in a better state than before the 2008 crisis, a report published yesterday by the Institute of Directors (IoD) found little confidence among business leaders.

24% of firms surveyed said they planned to freeze recruitment while 36% said they would cut investment following the Brexit result. A further 5% planned to make redundancies. IoD’s director general Simon Walker spoke bluntly: “We can’t sugar-coat this, many of our members are feeling anxious.”

Related News

'We will analyse the circumstances and consider the question of relocation once we have further clarity, and then put options to ESSNA members.' © iStock.com / Bee-individual

We will build on links with other member states, says sports nutrition sector

Photo: iStock

READERS' SURVEY: What does Brexit mean for you?

What does Brexit mean for your business? We want to know... Pic: iStock/AlexLMX

Brexit and your business: Have your say

©iStock

Brexit & your business: Have your say

Why did 52% of the electorate of the UK vote to leave the European Union?  © iStock.com / lenscap67

A dummies' guide to Brexit

'I would expect those rules to be changed to say ‘from Europe’ not only the European Union,' says head of EFSA's nutrition unit. ©iStock/Bee-individual

Brexit may force EFSA to change its 'nationality balance' policy

FoodNavigator readers shared their (mostly negative) thoughts on the UK's decision to leave the EU, of which it has been a member since 1973.

What does Brexit mean for your business? It means one third may now relocate outside of the UK

©iStock

Industry split on Brexit business impact: Poll

'So what an extraordinary opportunity Brexit has given Britain to deregulate and take the lead in global functional foods and supplements innovation...' ©iStock

Brexit: Britain can lead global functional foods & supplements markets

EU court rules that professionals cannot be expected to permanently have all up-to-date scientific knowledge necessary to evaluate each claim in advertising. ©iStock

B2B ads are not safe from health claim regulation: EU court confirms

BASF was one of the 35 multinationals that benefited from the state-sanctioned tax scheme that saw an overall €700 million in taxes go unpaid. ©iStock/Piotr Adamowicz

BASF joins multinationals challenging Commission's 'illegal' tax ruling

Between 2007 and 2013, the UK got €3.4bn more back from the EU in science funding than it was putting in. So what does this mean for UK science post Brexit? ©iStock/shironosov

Filling a €3.4bn deficit: UK research post Brexit

'Slower revenue growth, coupled with prolonged business uncertainty, is affecting the industry’s ability to invest' ©iStock/FutroZen

Brexit blasts British food industry boldness

Unilever & Tesco close 'Marmitegate'

Unilever & Tesco close 'Marmitegate'

The FPC have also called on the UK for support in introducing ‘novel’ fruit and vegetables onto the UK market with provisions for the complex application and registration process required under the EU Novel Foods Regulation. ©iStock

FPC urges UK Government to revise fruit & veg trading terms, post-Brexit

A vote to quit the EU could blight the British economy until 2020, claimed the new report

Food industry ‘blighted until 2020’ if Brexit wins vote

Unwrapped: What does Brexit mean for the confectionery industry? iStock - mabe123

Confectionery to be worst hit UK food sector after Brexit, says Euromonitor

Photo: iStock

Britain votes to leave the EU: What now?

A Brexit vote would impact food and drink more than other sectors, warned Liz Truss

Food sector 'better off in the EU': Liz Truss

The NFU is organizing 28 events around the UK for farmers to discuss the implications of the UK's potential exit from the EU.

NFU won’t campaign, but opposes Brexit

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (2)

Dr. Rick Kozlenko - 28 Jun 2016 | 07:03

Pessimism

Taking a flawed premise and bringing it to a logical conclusion is Sartre's definition of absurd. America for instance does not belong to the EU yet our industry has elevated its philosophy, standards, and detail to science and health commensurate with the EU. Why would a country like England who is trying to regain its political dignity and distinction once again simply abandon the important gains made in this vital industry and its positive effects on public health? This "sky is falling" pessimism is typical of the embedded bureaucrats and not part of a mindset encouragning healthy change and independence.

28-Jun-2016 at 19:03 GMT

s.p.matthews - 28 Jun 2016 | 06:16

Leave behind the pessimism

Such an inward looking, down beat lack of confidence in our own people and industry is precisely what we must leave behind. Professor Lang's views are of yesterday. We will move forward now and yes carry on with our friends in Europe and beyond - but I have faith that in 5 years' time this will be seen as our great escape from what is essentially a sclerotic, protectionist customs union that stifles innovation (and don't get me onto the subject of the democratic deficit and the corruption). Our destiny is for us to make a bright future.

28-Jun-2016 at 18:16 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.