EU Commission could take UK and its ‘traffic light’ labels to courts of justice

UK ‘traffic light’ labels could be taken to EU courts of justice

The European Commission is investigating whether the UK’s ‘traffic light’ front of pack labelling is compatible with EU law, something which could result in an infringement procedure, it says.

A spokesperson for Italian Commissioner Antonio Tajani said he had received several complaints from European companies expressing concerns as to the impact of the nutrition labelling system in the UK, whereby they claimed that “adoption of a hybrid labelling scheme combining reference intakes and a traffic light colour coding in UK would fragment the issue of nutrition labelling in the EU”.  

The spokesperson said the Commission could currently only confirm that it was in the process of “examining the compatibility of the concerned measures with provisions of EU law”.

But added: “Should the assessment of the reply conclude on the infringement of provisions of EU law, the Commission may decide to start an infringement procedure.” 

They said a decision would be announced in the next few weeks along with other possible member state infringements.  

Possible consequences

The Commission said that there would be several steps in such a process, the final being the referral to the European courts of justice with “possible fines to be applied”.

The so called ‘traffic light’ scheme is a voluntary front-of-pack labelling system introduced in the UK by the country’s Food Standards Agency (FSA). The scheme ranks four nutrition elements – sugars, fat, saturated fatty acids and salt – by assigning a colour – red, green or amber – depending on content levels.

Proponents of the scheme say it provides a simple guide to making good nutrition choices, while critics say it is both over simplistic and could detract from attempts to harmonise food law in the Europe Union.

Legal proceedings

Member states are responsible for implementing EU law within its own legal system, but it falls to the Commission to ensure that this is correctly applied. In cases where a member state fails to comply with EU law, the Commission has the power to try to bring the infringement to an end and where necessary refer the case to the European court of justice. It can take “whatever action it deems appropriate in response to either a complaint or indications of infringements which it detects itself”.

Under the non-compliance procedure, the Commission first gives the member state the opportunity to conform voluntarily. A letter of formal notice marks the first stage in the pre-litigation procedure, at which point the Commission asks the state to submit its take on the problem with respect to EU law. The Commission spokesperson told us that a formal letter had not yet been issued. 

Referral by the Commission to the court of justice opens the litigation procedure, which the Commission has a discretionary power in deciding.  

Related News

French health minister proposes new preventative public health law, which could see the country adopting a similar nutrition labelling system to the UK's 'traffic light' scheme.

France considers ‘traffic light’ labelling as UK MEP hits back at EU threat of court case

The Commission has sent a formal letter to the UK, opening proceedings against the UK's 'traffic light' label, which could see the state facing court action.

Commission opens infraction proceedings against UK’s 'traffic light' label

The Commission has initiated legal proceedings against the UK's traffic light system - so why aren't any other labelling schemes facing the same problem?

UK's traffic light label is 'negative', says Commission

UK MEP says the traffic light label scheme adheres to all points laid out by the EU Food Information to Consumers Regulation

Don’t challenge UK traffic light label, make it EU-compulsory, MEP tells commissioners

Traffic light labels inspire low fat choices: Study

Low-fat choices likelier with traffic light labels, finds study

STOP fussing over UK traffic light labelling

STOP fussing over UK traffic light labelling

EU to reassess UK traffic light labels

EU to reassess UK traffic light labels

Survey suggests traffic light food labels prompt individuals to consider their health and to make healthier choices at point-of-purchase

Another green light for traffic light nutrition labels?

Multinationals won't adopt the system unless it is mandatory across the EU, says Willmott

Only EU regulation can ensure traffic light compliance, says MEP

UK traffic light labelling could harm Italian traditional foods

Italy says UK traffic light labelling could harm traditional foods

UEAPME: SMEs concerned about UK hybrid nutrition labels

UK traffic light labels could harm European SMEs, says industry body

Combined traffic light and GDA labelling may improve teens’ food choices: Study

Combined traffic light and GDA labelling may improve teens’ food choices: Study

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (3)

dieter E - 17 Jun 2014 | 12:20

traffic lights are ignored by consumers

The UK-approach is legally binding food companies; this is the EU-issue. In Germany we had the case that a producer of deep-frozen meals applied a traffic light labelling. It was expected, that this voluntary and additional information would be appreciated by the consumers. Studies revieled the opposite, this extra effort was ignored. And this company gave-up with traffic lights for the reason, it was of no advantage and revenue on the market place. Consequently, the basic question is, why to implement in UK any compulsory labelling which is ignored by the addressee, the consumer?

17-Jun-2014 at 00:20 GMT

Professor Owen Warnock - 17 Jun 2014 | 05:57

Traffic lights are NOT legally binding

In fact the traffic light system, althogh promoted by the UK government is not legally binding. It is true that there is some market pressure from retailers for manufacturers to apply traffic lights. What is puzzling is that it was exactly this kind of system that the new EU Food Information Regulation envisaged could be developed as "additional forms of expression and presentation" under Article 35. I strongly suspect that the objections come from producers of some traditional products who do not like the fact that the traffic lights do in fact communicate effectively to consumers the high fat, salt or sugar content of some of those products.

17-Jun-2014 at 17:57 GMT
MORE COMMENTS

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.