Traffic light labels: 'not the answer to obesity'

Clare Cheney gives traffic light labels the red light

Now that common sense has been confirmed by a consumer survey that traffic light labelling is confusing and misleading, maybe the Department of Health (DH) should sit up, take stock and review its strategy on healthy eating

According to the research commissioned by the Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM), a whopping 67% of consumers thought that products with red traffic lights for all ‘unhealthy’ nutrients was a warning to avoid consumption.

All new government campaigns should be required to pass the common sense litmus test before being unleashed. In this case, for example, if the survey had been conducted before the campaign was launched it is likely that the results would have been the same as those of the CIM.

Ignoring the facts

But, as we all know, governments of all persuasions are renowned for ignoring the facts if they don’t support their policies, so better in their view not to have a survey which might come up with the wrong result in advance.

Traffic light labelling is useful for consumers who understand how to use it but these are in the minority. So, overall, the initiative is unhelpful and potentially detrimental, particularly when you bear in mind that more than half of those surveyed thought they should restrict themselves to products with all green lights.

Such a diet could lead to malnutrition due to lack of essential nutrients in many foods with red lights, such as cheese.

For the past 30 years or so, new food labelling was seen by governments and consumer organisations as the panacea for many food issues because label changes are visible and ‘proof’ that something had been done. It is much more difficult and takes longer to gauge whether other approaches, such as education, have been effective in meeting the desired objectives.

Do the work for the consumer

The DH’s Public Health Responsibility Deal has just released a ‘development tool’ for calorie reduction. This is another example of the government trying to get the food industry to do the work for consumers – in this case, reducing calorie intakes from diets, regardless of their composition; whether they are unhealthy and whether consumers are already overweight.

The government will believe it has succeeded if the overall calories in food produced by the industry are significantly reduced by several billion. But this continues to avoid the need for consumers to take some responsibility for their own diets. If overall calories are reduced, consumers may take it as a green light to eat more than they should.

Meanwhile, the Food Manufacture Group is staging a free, one-hour webinar on obesity to take place at 11am on Thursday July 3.

The online seminar – Obesity and health: the big fat, sugar and salt debate – will offer an independent perspective on how these controversial topics affect the UK food and drink industry and how food and drink manufacturers can help to remedy the crisis.

Reserve your free place at the webinar – organised in association with the Institute of Food Science and Technololgy – by emailing Michael.stones@wrbm.com

  • Clare Cheney is the director general of the Provision Trade Federation.

Related News

Knee-jerk reaction to red labels

Rise in red labels will discourage consumers

Luciana Berger: 'Voluntary agreements only take you so far'

Labour mulls legislation to beat obesity

Weighty argument: food and drink manufacturers have urged food scientists to counter the obesity views of some health lobby groups

Food scientists urged to enter UK obesity debate

Fat Europe: Study projects increased risk of obesity in 'almost all' of Europe by 2030

Fat Europe: Study projects increased risk of obesity in 'almost all' of Europe by 2030

Jones will take over the role in September, when Cheney retires

FDF boss to replace Cheney at helm of PTF

Reserve your free place at our one-hour webinar by emailing michael.stones@wrbm.com

Obesity webinar to set record straight on fat, salt and sugar

Tesco plans to ditch the sale of sweet and chocolates at all its checkouts by the end of the year

Tesco ditches ‘guilty’ sweet checkouts in all stores

Some own-brand ready meals contain almost twice the WHO recommended levels for free sugars, finds the Which? investigation.

Shocking levels of sugar in UK ready meals, says Which?

Traffic light labelling infringes the internal market, claims Italy

Europeans challenge UK traffic light scheme

Reactions to food labelling vary depending on consumer socioeconomic status, according to new research using popcorn.

Reactions to food labels vary by socioeconomic status

The Commission has sent a formal letter to the UK, opening proceedings against the UK's 'traffic light' label, which could see the state facing court action.

Commission opens infraction proceedings against UK’s 'traffic light' label

Traffic light labelling is failing to change consumer behaviour

Nutritional policies and guidance labels ‘failing’

Red traffic light labels activated a part of the brain associated with self-control in food choice

Traffic light labels may improve self-control

Tesco's strategic adviser Tim Smith. Picture courtesy of Tesco.plc

Tesco wants traffic light labels to include exercise

Key food manufacturers have not backed a system incorporating traffic light labelling

Food firms parry criticism as healthy promotions launch

Rick Pendrous, editor, Food Manufacture

Can new labels change consumer behaviour?

Food manufacturers should do more to endorse the hybrid front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme, said Sue Davies

Food manufacturers slammed for failing to embrace hybrid labels

Comments (3)

Lisa - 27 Jun 2014 | 02:47

this traffic light labelling is innefective

this labelling did not change the purchasing habits of consumers and did not decrease the obesity rate in the UK! quite the contrary, it's misleading consumers: they avoid saturated which are essential for a balanced diet.

27-Jun-2014 at 14:47 GMT

Caroline Craig - 16 May 2014 | 09:39

Just because it's bad...

Maybe 67% think they shouldn't eat it, but it doesn't mean that they wouldn't eat it, they would just feel guilty afterwards. Anyway, obesity is achieved after continually eating too much and once the weight is on it takes a long time to get it off. I don't like the traffic light system and never have and agree with the article that consumers need to control their own eating habits, not expect the government to control them.

16-May-2014 at 09:39 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.