‘Sin taxes’ are regressive and impose middle class values on the working class: Economist

'Sin taxes' are a real blind spot for the left, and ultimately reflect middle class values of health over wealth, says free-market economist. Photo credit: Derrick Tyson.

‘Sin taxes’ as a strategy to curb consumption of foods high in salt, fats and sugar are regressive and disproportionately costly for businesses and consumers, according to an economist from the Institute of Economic Affairs.

Discussing a recent report from the European Commission on the impacts of so called ‘sin taxes’, Christopher Snowdon, lifestyle economics director for the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA), told FoodNavigator: There’s a big administrative burden from these kinds of taxes and they are regressive and they do encourage a certain amount of cross-border shopping.”

The author of the separate IEA report Aggressively Regressive: The 'sin taxes' that make the poor poorer, which focused on the Danish fat tax example, said he agreed with many of the Commission’s conclusions about possible unintended consequences. 

He added such taxes put too much focus on middle class values of health wealth, and not enough on helping working class people save actual monetary wealth. In his own report last year, Snowdon said for every eight pounds spent by the poorest fifth of households in Britain, one pound was taken in ‘sin taxes’ including duty on tobacco, alcohol and motor fuels, betting taxes, vehicle excise duty, air passenger duty and ‘green taxes’.

Instead, for the food and beverage industry voluntary reformulation made better business sense and responded to consumer demand, which he said ultimately should not be ignored. 

What are the consequences?

He admitted that these kinds of taxes would change consumption, however the administrative costs for the state and businesses as well as the budgetary strain it placed upon consumers could not be justified by the “trivial” changes seen in places like Denmark, where a fat tax was in place for 15-months from 2011 before being scraped for fear of inflated food prices and employment insecurity.

As with the EU report, he warned that upping taxes could see people switching to poorer quality, cheaper products, or even hopping the border to avoid the levies.

Middle class values?

Snowdon called ‘sin taxes’ a “real blind spot for the left”, saying those normally in favour of abolishing policies disproportionate to income were often conversely in favour of this tax.

He said the poorest 20% of households in Britain spent an average of £1,286 a year on ‘sin taxes’, on top of the £1,165 already spent on VAT.

He put this stance down to middle class snobbery, and criticised the left’s attitude towards working class worries over household budgets.

Asked if he saw the argument that health was a form of wealth in that those who were healthy may be more likely to be in and stay in employment, he said it was down to the individual to balance those aspects.

Public vs. private, taxes vs. reformulation

Snowdon said reformulation was a far better option than tax changes, if done voluntarily and in cooperation with government and businesses and with consumer demand in mind.

He said if such healthier alternatives were available it would be a matter of private health and personal choice, adding the attitude of public health lobbyists that the industry was purposefully poisoning its consumers was unhelpful.

Asked if it was not arguable that consumption habits were indeed a public health concern considering the long-term implications of unhealthy eating and drinking, the free-market fan said if this stance was to be taken no line could be truly drawn between the state-controlled public and private, personal choices.

Pricing elasticity

Comparing consumption taxes on food and drink with those on tobacco, he said the latter was much more straight forward. The purpose of tobacco taxes was to stop people smoking altogether, whereas with food and drink it was to change consumption habits.

He said the price elasticity – how much people were willing to pay for something – of tobacco was wildly different to food, since food was an essential item people would do almost anything for. 

Related News

The team suggests that people have more negative views toward the idea of consuming 28 sugar cubes compared to consuming 70 grams of sugar.

Sugary drinks are less appealing with images of sugar cube content

"Whilst we are pleased to record an average national reduction in salt consumption coming from food of nearly a gram per day, we are disappointed to find out that the benefits of such a programme have not reached those most in need,”

Salt reduction and social inequality? UK reduction policies 'have not reached those most in need'

In order to address the issue of tooth decay, the team recommend a series of radical policy changes to reduce sugar consumption, including slashing sugar intakes to 3%.

Researchers call for ‘radical rethink’ of free sugars targets

A trend that sees healthier diets becoming more expensive could result in people increasingly turning to less healthy food choices, which could exacerbate social inequalities in health, say the research team.

Price gap between ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ foods is growing wider

The exact impact of food 'sin' taxes on the European agri-food sector needs to be further assessed, says Commission

What’s top on the Commission’s food forum agenda?

'What I have always said and continue to say is that there is a limit to how much you can do through voluntary means,' says Dr Susan Jebb

Voluntary public health measures 'can only go so far’: UK Responsibility Deal chair

"We suggest that energy-dense foods might be taxed, while fruit and vegetables whose prices often rise compared to other foods, might be subsidised. [But] much comes down to the political appetite to contemplate taxing foods," wrote the authors.

Taxation necessary to offset rising cost of a healthy diet

A new EU report suggests taxes on fat, sugar, or other unhealthy foods can help to reduce consumption levels. However the report also warns that the issues are complex and that such levies can have unexpected effects

'Sin taxes' on unhealthy foods will work, says EU report

Danish meat group claims 'fat tax' violates EU law

European SME association oppose ‘sin taxes’

Sin tax debate: Make the healthy choice the cheaper choice

Sin tax debate: Make the healthy choice the cheaper choice

Burden of ‘fat taxes’ questioned

Burden of ‘fat taxes’ questioned

Taxes on unhealthy consumer goods like sugar-sweetened soft drinks could improve public health, argue the researchers.

'Sin taxes' must raise food prices by 20% for any effect, argue experts

French authorities approve soda tax legislation

French authorities approve soda tax legislation

RD: There’s a health continuum for every food; what pillars do you want to stand on?

RD: There’s a health continuum for every food; what pillars do you want to stand on?

Related Products

See more related products

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.