"Environment Council has just broken the deadlock on the GMO cultivation proposal": Commission

European Commission reaches ‘political agreement’ on GM cultivation proposal

“This is a real step forward in unblocking the dysfunctional EU process for approving GM crops, which is currently letting down our farmers and stopping scientific development," UK Environment Secretary

The European Commission’s Environmental Council has “broken the deadlock” on GM crop cultivation proposals with a political agreement around how member states can restrict or ban such crop production on their soil.

In a statement from the Commissioner in charge, Tonio Borg, said the agreement met member states consistent calls for more flexibility and legal certainty around national sovereignty in decisions on the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GM0). Commissioner Borg said the compromise entailed a two-step procedure that allowed member states to partially or totally ban GMO cultivation within their territory via an “opt out measure”, without initially having to provide justification.

Responding to the announcement yesterday, the UK’s Secretary of State for the Environment, Owen Paterson, said the move was a step forward in “unblocking the dysfunctional EU process for approving GM crops”.

The Commission said this system would offer “extended and legally sound possibilities for member states to better take into account their national context when deciding on GMO cultivation”.

The Council must now reach agreement with the European Parliament in order for the proposal to become law. The Commission hopes this will mean the legal tool will be used from 2015.

two-step procedure

The first step covers the ’pre-authorisation geographical scope restriction’, while step two concerns the ‘post-authorisation opt-out’.

The initial step allows member states to request the applicant company, via the Commission, to specify in the application that the GMO cannot be cultivated on all or part of its territory, which can be done without “justification” from the stateIn this first step companies can accept or reject the adjustments to its application’s geographical reach. However, if it does not accept member states can still issue an outright ban, regardless of the company’s stance.  

Secondly, the member state will be able, by using an “opt-out measure”, to have the final say not to cultivate an GMO already authorised in the EU on its soil.

With regards to this phase, the Commission said: “After authorisation of the GMO, the member states’ opt out measures have to be based on a wide range of reasons such as: environmental or agricultural policy objectives, town and country planning, land use, socio-economic impacts, avoidance of GMO presence in other products, or public policy, to name a few.” 

Within the agreement, member states retain their right to change their decision during the ten-year GM authorisation period, if new objective circumstances arise. It could also see states allowing GMO cultivation in some regions, and not others. 

‘This is a real step forward in unblocking the dysfunctional EU process’

Commissioner Borg said the outcome - which comes as a direct response to a request made by 13 member states in 2009 - was a balanced compromise text, and he thanked the Greek Presidency for finding common ground amongst the different views and concerns. He said:"I am delighted to announce that the Environment Council has just broken the deadlock on the GMO cultivation proposal and has reached a political agreement that moves towards a new legal basis giving Member States the choice to restrict or prohibit the cultivation of GMOs on their territory."

The UK’s Environment Secretary, said: “This is a real step forward in unblocking the dysfunctional EU process for approving GM crops, which is currently letting down our farmers and stopping scientific development.”

“If the European Parliament passes this law, all regions of the UK will have more power in deciding whether to grow GM crops that have passed a robust, independent safety assessment.

“Resolving the gridlock in Europe will boost scientific research and investment in the UK, a key part of our long-term economic plan,” he said.

The UK has invested £160m in its Agri-Tech Strategy, according to the country’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The department said this proposal was an example of how the EU could be flexible, allowing greater control for members states to make their own decisions that were in their national interest.

Related News

"Our long-term economic plan is all about backing the do-ers and the hard-workers – and no one does more or works as hard in Britain today than our farmers," UK Prime Minister David Cameron says.

UK public sector sourcing plan backs local food industry: ‘All food that can be bought locally will be bought locally’

Owen Paterson on CAP: 'On greening, we did not win on crop diversification and the Ecological Focus Area requirements have come with too great an administrative burden.'

EU greening policy will unduly burden farmers, ex- enviro minister says

Member states should not have to negotiate with big GM firms, members of parliament say.

MEPs voice GM cultivation ‘loophole’ concerns: Member states mustn’t face corporate court action

Latest rumours see internal market and enlargement in European neighbourhood posts disappearing

Juncker European Commission line-up leaked

"We can't put pressure on societies saying this is the only way," says GM researcher

The road to fish-oil equivalent GM camelina

England should follow Scotland's lead if it wants to protect its food industry, says Soil Association

Scotland to ban GM crops: ‘GM would damage our clean, green brand’

Monsanto's MON810 maize, resistant to the corn borer pest, is the only GM crop currently commercially cultivated in the EU

Draft law to ban GM cultivation in EU countries is legally flawed, says Greenpeace

Omega-3 enriched camelina trials will be the only GM field trials currently in the UK. Photo credit: Sarah Usher/Rothamsted Research

DEFRA gives GM camelina omega-3 project go-ahead

Proposed GM law changes has created uproar

Proposed GM law creates uproar

EFSA releases all data on Monsanto’s GM maize

EFSA releases all data on Monsanto’s GM maize

UK government to intervene in Monsanto GM soy case

UK government to intervene in Monsanto GM soy case

Monsanto's MON810 corn is the only commercially successful GM crop cultivated in Europe - but it accounts for less than 1% of European-grown corn

Monsanto pulls European GM crop applications

Monsanto has said it will scrap lobbying in most of the EU in order to focus on area where there is 'wider acceptence' of its GM crop technology.

Monsanto to pull the plug on GM lobbying and activities in Europe

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

Stella H Howell - 16 Jun 2014 | 12:46

EC reaches ...Political Agreement....'

Here is 'inside' Truth, as an analogy. Recently an active sprayer of Chem-Trails in USA; an employee of the NHS; a regional manager of GSK all received final verdicts by the Natural Law. The first was injected with a deadly vaccine on the pretext that he would be immune to that which he sprays on others; the second was deliberately injected so that he could not continue injecting others particularly children whose lives were terminated and the third committed suicide due to the investigation. As we do to others, so shall be done to us first to our seed, then our loved ones.This is the never changing, never updating Natural Law. However, your lives will now be prolonged. You will have no alternative but to consume that which you have created.Drink the water which has slime etc. Fruit is not Fruit. Fruit has living cells created by Mother Earth. Fruit is Poison. Fruit has reptilian, scorpion, insect, rodent dna besides viruses and bacteria. So be it. Enjoy your makings.

16-Jun-2014 at 12:46 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.