Commission to set maximum acrylamide levels in ready-to-eat foods

© iStock/Bhofack2

The European Commission plans to set maximum levels for acrylamide in ready-to-eat foods such as baby foods, crisps and breakfast cereals.

The actual levels, and the full list of affected foods, will be decided later this year in discussions following the adoption of the regulatory measure currently being proposed: compulsory measures to reduce the risk of acrylamide forming in food, and use of benchmark levels to verify their efficacy.

With these envisaged regulatory measures in place, “the EU shall have the strictest regulation [on acrylamide] worldwide”, the director of the EU’s Food and Feed Safety and Innovation Unit, Sabine Juelicher, told members of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety(ENVI).

Acrylamide, a chemical contaminant that is known to increase the risk of cancer, forms naturally when starchy foods are fried or roasted and occurs both in home cooking and during industrial food processing.

Fried potatoes, coffee and coffee substitutes and cereal-based foods such as biscuits are the biggest contributors to Europeans’ intake, and a 2012 scientific opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) said exposure was as a concern across all age groups. Infants, however, are the most exposed to the contaminant per kilo body weight.

A spokesperson for industry lobby FoodDrinkEurope told us it was waiting for the official publication of the Commission’s proposal before commenting on the levels.

Juelicher stressed that the Commission’s work was still evolving.

Mandatory mitigation measures

The mandatory mitigation measures will require food business operators to evaluate risk of acrylamide formation for their products; devise measures to reduce the risk; monitor their own systems and present samples for analysis.

Official controls and analyses will also be carried out.

Benchmark levels – “set at a very strict level taking into account the most recent data which we have in the EFSA database” – will be used to assess the efficacy of the mitigation measures.

The mitigation measures will take into account the size and nature of each business in question.

“All in all, the Commission is convinced that the envisaged measures shall really result in an effective reduction of the presence of acrylamide in food,” she said at the exchange of views which took place on 31 January.

“We are really looking at a comprehensive overall package of initiatives,” she said.

Awareness campaigns by member state agencies and consumer organisations also had an important part to play in educating consumers as home cooking contributed “in significant part” to acrylamide intake, she added.

Legal foundations ‘make sense’

Several MEPs probed Juelicher on the Commission’s choice of hygiene regulation as the legal basis for drafting legislation on acrylamide, rather than EU regulation on contaminants in food.

MEPs and public concern groups had previously suggested such legal foundations were shaky, meaning any regulation passed would not comply with higher-ranking law.

Juliche responded by saying it made sense because the hygiene regulation requires industry to take responsibility for the safety of its own products.

The binding maximum levels for certain foods, however, would be founded on the relevant regulation for chemical contaminants.

Using these two different regulations reflected the complexity of the issue. “It’s not a technical contaminant we can ban,” she said, adding that it required applying best practice techniques to food processing as well as selecting certain raw materials and using specific storage techniques.

Related News

© iStock

Acrylamide needs to be regulated at the source, says expert

© iStock/AHPhotoswpg

Nestlé baby biscuits exceed EU benchmark levels for acrylamide: French survey

© Renaissance

Orkla snaps up distribution deal for acrylamide-reducing yeast

© iStock

Acrylamide-free: Does it exist?

The levels of acrylamide found in infant and young children’s diets was a concern to the Committee on Toxicity

Levels of acrylamides in children’s diet a concern

Campaigners said the rules still don’t go far enough.  © iStock

Acrylamide proposals strengthened in new draft

'The [Commission's] proposal in its current form also excludes all imports which represent a significant part of the market,' said Nuša Urbančič at Changing Markets. © iStock/Zerbor

Acrylamide levels in Europe are dangerously high, says NGO

Renaissance is in discussions with potential production partners

Renaissance non-GMO, acrylamide-reducing yeast gains GRAS status

© iStock

Critics hammer Commission's draft acrylamide regulation

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (2)

Giuliano Franceschini - 10 Feb 2017 | 12:47

A real hazard?

Actually California IS in the USA and California's Law called Prop 65 is much more stringent. This is easy to show: the Prop 65 states that the NSRL (No Significant Risk Level for carcinogenic substances) for Acrylamide (AA) is 0,2 micrograms/day. This means that a if a 70 kg man eats one portion of a product per day (e.g 30 grams/day for a potato chip) every day, for 70 year, he will have a low risk of having a cancer because of AA. This implies that the producthe eats should have no more than 6,7 ppb of AA. However, in the same time, the Prop 65 is also enforced in a strange way: the General Attorney of California has reached a settlement with several companies producing snacks, setting at 275 ppb the maximum permitted content of AA. This is over 40 times the Law limit! Now therefore: 1) "the Americans" may say that "AA risks are so small as to ignore", but their Law do not say the same. BTW: a Company selling in Maine has no guarantee that its products wil not go in California in some way 2) in theory the Law of California is much more stringent 3) such Law is (fortunately) enforced in a reasonable way 4) no limit has been set by EU yet, but the rumors are in favour of a reasonable limit, where reasonable = technically achievable

10-Feb-2017 at 12:47 GMT

Bob Salmon - 09 Feb 2017 | 05:09

A real hazard?

the Americans still say the risks from acrylamide are so small as to ignore. Why are the European lot making such a fuss?

09-Feb-2017 at 17:09 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.