No, wheat does not make people fat and sick: Scientists

Obesity has a multifactorial causation and there is no scientific data to suggest that wheat consumption causes it, scientists say

The idea that wheat causes obesity or sickness has been rubbished by scientists conducting a review.

Published in the Journal of Cereal Science a team from Maastricht University in the Netherlands and the Crop Science group of Rothamsted Research UK set out to dispel myths and misconceptions around wheat consumption – fueled, they said, by non-peer reviewed publications.

They concluded that no data justifies a negative opinion about whole-wheat products in a healthy population, based on a review of peer-reviewed, controlled scientific studies.

“After earlier debates on the role of fat, high fructose corn syrup, and added sugar in the aetiology of obesity, it has recently been suggested that wheat consumption is involved. Suggestions have been made that wheat consumption has adverse effects on healthy by mechanisms related to addiction and overeating,” they wrote.

US cardiologist William Davis, for example, published ‘Wheat Belly’ in 2011 in which he suggested that wheat consumption increased the waistline and was a ‘perfect, chronic poison’. He argued that opioids in the wheat proved addictive due to new components created by genetic modification.

However, the scientists said that these claims were based on “different and controversial hypotheses.”

“We consider that statements made in the book of Davis, as well as in related interviews, cannot be substantiated based on published scientific studies,” they wrote.

Wheat consumption and obesity have no parallel, although wheat sales and sports shoes sales do…

The scientists argued that assigning the cause of obesity to one specific type of food, rather than overconsumption and inactive lifestyle in general, was incorrect.

“These discussions fail to take into account that obesity has a multifactorial causation…Whole-wheat consumption cannot be linked to increased prevalence of obesity in the general population,” they said.

The scientists said it is certainly true that an increase in wheat sales has a parallel with an increase in obesity, but so too does an increase in the sales of cars, mobile phones and sports shoes with the average speed of winners in the Tour de France.

“Hard data about adverse effects of wheat, consumed in baked, extruded, and other processed foods, are not available, and there are no grounds to advise the general public not to consume this common dietary staple,” they warned.

Wheat is not that different from old times… and it can promote health

Responding to suggestions from Davis that current wheat contains new grain components from genetic modification, the scientists said comparative studies and research on old and new strains has proved otherwise.

They acknowledged that scientific breeding had led to controlled wheat genes to ensure higher yields, pest resistance and good processing properties, but that there was no evidence that selective breeding has led to detrimental effects on the nutritional properties or health benefits of the grain.

“Arguments that the currently consumed wheat has been genetically modified resulting in adverse effects on body weight and illnesses cannot be substantiated.”

The scientists cited five recent scientific reviews that conclude the consumption of whole grains exerts positive effects on health.

“Foods containing whole-wheat, which have been prepared in customary ways (such as baked or extruded), and eaten in recommended amounts, have been associated with significant reductions in risks for type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and a more favorable long term weight management.”

However, gluten sensitivity must be addressed…

The scientists said that consumers with gluten sensitivity or a genetic predisposition for developing celiac disease are the only people who would benefit from avoiding wheat and other cereals containing proteins related to gluten, as well as rye and barley.

“It is therefore important for these individuals that the food industry should develop a much wider spectrum of foods, based on crops that do not contain proteins related to gluten, such as teff, amaranth, oat, quinoa, and chia.”

 

Source: Journal of Cereal Science
Published September 2013, Volume 58, Issue 2, pages 209-215. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.06.002
“Does wheat make us fat and sick?”
Authors: FJPH. Brouns, VJ. Van Buul and PR. Shewry

Related News

The natural protein elafin is less abundant in people with celiac disease which could explain gut inflammation association with the disorder, the scientists say

Natural protein elafin ‘promising’ in battle against gluten toxicity: Study

INRA wants to gain EU approval to continue its research in humans, but must convince EFSA on the use of genetically-modified probiotic bacteria as a delivery method. Photo Credit: Dee Gee, Flickr

Elafin for gluten toxicity faces GMO hurdle, says chief scientist

Brett Carver, Regents Professor at Oklahoma State University. Source: Whole Grains Council

5 myths about wheat and whole grains dispelled

32% of dietitians forecast continued fondness for ancient grains and seeds, like chia, in 2014.

Dietitians say anti-wheat, pro-nutrition info sentiments will top 2014 trends

Gluten free ‘most popular diet' (but it doesn’t work, say dietitians)

Gluten free ‘most popular approach to weight loss’ for 2013 (but it doesn’t work, say dietitians)

Increased fibre may prevent obesity by controlling intestinal glucose: Study

Increased fibre may prevent obesity by controlling intestinal glucose: Study

Barley extracts show weight management potential: Human data

Barley extracts show weight management potential: Human data

Flaxseed may offer improvements for obese pre-diabetics

Flaxseed may offer improvements for obese pre-diabetics

ViSalus CEO says the cereal category has seen 'little innovation' in the past 100 years

UPDATE: High protein ‘super’ cereal targets global obesity epidemic, says developer

Comments (8)

RH Omea - 31 Jan 2014 | 04:08

Justin - Read the Scientific data then make comments

because doing so before hand makes your comments look foolish. The Journal of Science is part of the Elsevier Publishing Group - a well respected publisher that only allows peer-reviewed science to see the light of day. Read and learn: http://bit.ly/1fBPDZv

31-Jan-2014 at 04:08 GMT

Justin - 29 Jan 2014 | 11:24

Journal for Cereal Science?

This is little like saying there is no proof that alcohol causes drunk drivers. True, that the increase in the intake of alcohol parallels with DUI related deaths, but it also parallels the increase of profanity and one-night stands. Should we expect better information from the Journal of Cereal Science?! Let me guess, there is a study in there somewhere that says that candy bars are good for you too. Next time I have doubts on the safety of tobacco, I'll be sure to consult the Journal for Tobacco Science!

29-Jan-2014 at 23:24 GMT
MORE COMMENTS

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.