Action on Sugar removes bread from high-sugar hit list: 'We acknowledge it was not accurate'

“If we want to help consumers understand what’s in food, it’s important we do that in an accurate way,” says Federation of Bakers following Action on Sugar retraction.

Anti-sugar lobby group Action on Sugar has removed bread from its initial list of products containing ‘large amounts of sugar’.

As part of the pressure group’s seven-step plan to reduce UK sugar intakes – including reducing added sugar in foods by 40%, introducing a sugar tax on foods and banning ‘junk food’ sponsorship of sports events  – it placed bread amongst foods that contained more sugar than consumers may realize.

Gordon Polson, director of the Federation of Bakers that flagged the issue with the campaign group, told the reference to bread was “certainly unfortunate”.

Katharine Jenner, campaign director and nutritionist for the organization, said: “The press release did include bread in the list of products containing ‘large amounts of sugar’, which we acknowledge is not accurate, as although many do contain a type of naturally occurring sugars (which would still be a ‘free sugar’, I believe), they often do not have ‘sugar’ as an ingredient, and even then, not in large amounts.”

Polson said: “If we want to help consumers understand what’s in food, it’s important we do that in an accurate way.”

Counting sugar cubes

The original Action on Sugar release said: It's not just the well-known brands, such as Coca-Cola which has a staggering 9 teaspoons of added sugar, but flavoured water, sports drinks, yogurts, ketchup, ready meals and even bread are just a few everyday foods that contain large amounts of hidden sugars”.

This statement was then followed by a table of the sugar content – including added and naturally-occurring - of products like Coca-Cola Original, Butterkist Toffee Popcorn,  Heinz Classic Tomato Soup and Kellogg's Frosties. Hovis Soft White Bread Medium was among this table of sugars per portion and will remain there as a useful guide for shoppers to be aware to check the label and ideally choose the lowest sugar breads and bread-related products,” Action on Sugar said.

In the same release Professor Simon Capewel, one of the groups’ campaigners, called sugar “the new tobacco”.   

Polson said the initial classification was inaccurate it its “unfortunate assumption” that bread contained added sugar. He said most bread contained only naturally-occurring sugars, and in the case of additions in some wholemeal loaves this ‘total sugar’ content was still low at around 4 g per 100 g. He said it was also important to acknowledge the “significant contribution bread makes to a healthy diet”.  

Commenting on the retraction, he said: “The objective wasn’t to receive an apology – just to acknowledge there was an error.”

Calling into question

Asked if the lobby group would be re-evaluating any other categorisations, Jenner said: “No other categories have been brought into question, however as a new campaign, our work is continually evolving as new information comes to light – for instance the new draft SACN report states we should collectively use the term ‘free sugars’ instead of ‘added sugars’, and thus we have amended our aims accordingly.”

“We feel it is very important to listen to the challenges of sugar reduction from manufacturers and producers, and have spent the last six months since the campaign launched working out the feasibility of a sugar reduction programme. We are still 100% confident that it can, and will, halt the obesity epidemic,” she said.

Labelling sugar

Polson said that the total sugar levels of bread per serving would still amount to a  ‘low sugar content’ and coded green categorisation within the UK’s voluntary front-of-pack labelling scheme since it contained less than 5 g of sugar.

He said in this respect the so called ‘traffic light’ scheme was clearer for consumers than if they were to just look at ingredient lists.  

Related News

Fletchers has reduced bitterness, increased sweetness and removed hydrogenated fats and preservatives in its 50:50 bread

Fletchers launches 50:50 sliced bread for foodservice

We tried low GI in the 90s, it didn't stick, says Mintel

Is low GI too complicated for consumers?

UK bakery market to grow by 9% by 2020

UK bakery market to grow by 9% by 2020

'It is wise not to attempt to silence NGOs nor thwart legitimate campaigning activities,' warns Dr Carrie Ruxton. Photo:

Are you dictating to me? UK industry group and health charity clash over reformulation

Food in nine specifc categories will have sugar limit recommendations, including cakes, biscuits, chocolate and sweets, ice cream, puddings, yoghurts, breakfast goods and sweet spreads. ©iStock/ratmaner

UK guidelines target cakes and cereals in drive to cut sugar by 20%

Action on Sugar: Global compaign takes aim at high sugar foods

Action on Sugar: New global campaign takes aim at high level of sugar in foods and drinks

Don't miss out on your free place at our one-hour online seminar on obesity, due for broadcast at 11am GMT on Thursday July 3

Obesity webinar backed by British Dietetic Association and Nutrition Society

Related Products

See more related products

Comments (1)

David Kelland - 16 Jul 2014 | 04:48

Sugar, The new Tobacco!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

does this mean that the goverment will be ladelling in huge sums of money into the tax slush fund from the already struggling public taxpayer. when has the taxation of food and drink had any effect on the public's consumption of the food or drink or tobacco usage. It is simply a way of sneaking funds for strangely titled Quangos that spring up to make the government look as though they are concerned about something. A sop to the nation..As with the salt issue we all know that food including bread now has a much more bland taste, and is it any wonder that we see people putting added salt on their foods and piles of ketchup etc. I find that sandwiches purchased from the majority of compliant supermarkets are so gutless that I will open them up and add a small pinch of salt to replace that which the government nanny state has taken out. whilst I can understand the fear that sugar is a way of putting on fat, I maintain that surely, a slice less or, a missed packet of crisps, a chocolate bar, a walk to the shops instead using the car is far more beneficial than spending millions on a new group to cause industry and the public a lot of frustration and disappointment when they go to eventually eat or drink their favorite food or drink after the manufacturer has had to put in sweeteners that create a very sloppy response in the nether regions. I still find it strange that a product with no added sugar has to be indicated as a green on the traffic light system.

16-Jul-2014 at 16:48 GMT

Submit a comment

Your comment has been saved

Post a comment

Please note that any information that you supply is protected by our Privacy and Cookie Policy. Access to all documents and request for further information are available to all users at no costs, In order to provide you with this free service, William Reed Business Media SAS does share your information with companies that have content on this site. When you access a document or request further information from this site, your information maybe shared with the owners of that document or information.